← All capabilities

Capability

Subcontract scope review, and the gaps nobody owns

Scope gaps do not announce themselves. They turn up as a change order months later, when the only question left is who pays.

What the agent does

  • Review a subcontract scope against a 32 trade checklist and report what is missing, undecided or excluded
  • Map responsibility boundaries across trades and flag the ones written into only one subcontract
  • Flag the items that are chronically nobody's scope, such as firestopping, sleeves and hoisting
  • Draft a scope exhibit for a trade, with every open decision marked for a human to answer
  • Pull a contract from your portal, read it even if it is a scan, and review it unattended

Missing, undecided or excluded

Those are three different problems and they get confused constantly. Missing means nobody wrote it down. Undecided means it was raised and never settled. Excluded means a trade explicitly refused it. The review separates them, because each one needs a different person to do something about it.

The items that are nobody's scope

Firestopping, sleeves and hoisting are the classic examples: everyone assumes another trade has them, and no subcontract says so. Those get flagged specifically rather than being left to be discovered on site.

Boundaries written into only one subcontract

A responsibility that appears in one trade's scope and nowhere else looks settled when you read that contract alone. Mapping boundaries across trades is what makes the one-sided ones visible.

Open decisions are marked, not guessed

When it drafts a scope exhibit, every open decision is marked for a person to answer. It does not quietly pick an answer to produce a document that looks finished.

Questions

What owners ask first.

A 32 trade checklist, reporting what is missing, undecided or excluded as three separate categories rather than one list of problems.

See it on your own work